13. A reading of Rule 18 itself would indicate that it deals with scenarios of grant of license to stone crushers. Rule 18(v) stipulates that trade/D&O license shall not be granted to a stone crusher unit, if the site is not situated within a distance of 500 metres from a State Highway or National Highway.
This Court in CST v. Lal Kunwa Stone Crusher (P...2(e-1) of the U.P Act appears to be similar to the definition under consideration.7. In view of the judgment of this Court in Lal Kunwa Stone Crusher (P) Ltd...have taken, the judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Kher Stone Crusher v. G.M, District Industries Centre (1990) 79 …
No stone crusher shall operate in the above said area form August 15, 1992 onward. (3) The writ petitions filed by the owners/proprietors of stone crushers in …
Kumaon Stone Crusher (S). Supreme Court Of India Feb 10, 2016; Subsequent References; CaseIQ (AI Recommendations) State Of Uttaranchal …
Get free access to the complete judgment in Slv Stone Crusher v. State Of Karnataka on CaseMine. Get free access to the complete judgment in Slv Stone Crusher v. State Of Karnataka on CaseMine. Log In. India; ... Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Latest Judgments State of Uttaranchal & Ors. v. M/s. Kumaon Stone Crusher. February 19, 2015. Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19445/2004. Shri S.R. Singh, learned senior counsel for the petitioner(s), on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Special Leave Petitions. Print ...
A letter addressed to the Supreme Court of India complained about the prevalence of bonded labour system in Cutton, Anangpur and Lakkarpur areas of Faridabad District in Haryana State. ... the various other directions given by us in this judgment have been and are being carried out by the mine lessees and stone crusher owners." This Court ...
3. The matter pertains to two stone crushers operated by the respondent nos. 4 and 5 in Village Fatta Bangar at Haldwani in Nainital District. The contention of the appellant (based on the report dated 7th April, 2014 of the Halka Patwari) is that the two stone crusher units are operating in violation of the statutory environmental
Get free access to the complete judgment in Ashok Stone Crusher,... v. State Of Uttarakhand... on CaseMine.
PER C.L. SETHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER: The assessee is in appeal against the order dated 14.10.2008 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) in the matter of an assessment made under sec.143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) by the Assessing Officer for the Assessment Year 2005-06.
Get free access to the complete judgment in Anjani Stone Crusher... v. State Of Andhra Prad... on CaseMine.
Union of India (Stone Crushing Case), 1992 Supp (2) SCC 85, cases relating to Stone crushing operation in the vicinity of Delhi, wherein the total closure of the operation ordered by Union of India and crusher owner instead of approaching the Supreme Court in the pending matters, filed writ petitions in High Court and obtained interim orders ...
Get free access to the complete judgment in M/S VASAVI STONE CRUSHER v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on CaseMine.
In a historic case, 212 stone crushers were shifted out of Delhi to a 'Crushing Zone' set up in Haryana by an order of the Supreme Court on May 15th, 1992. Emission of more than 1500 tons of dust emitted daily in the atmosphere has been eliminated. ... This matter was taken up in the Supreme Court and vide an historic …
On 15 September 2017, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India (Supreme Court) delivered a judgment in the matter of State of Uttarakhand v Kumaon Stone Crusher deciding the issue of levy of transit ...
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. Petitioners are aggrieved by District Magistrate, Sonbhadra's order dated 20.05.2017 whereby referring to this Court's interim order dated 12.05.2017 passed in Public Interest Litigation (PIL) No. 18769 of 2017 (All India Kaimoor Peoples Front v.State of U.P), he has directed …
(1) The order passed in writ petition no. 5768/2008 (m/s, anu stone crusher v. Bank of india and others) will also govern the disposal of wrti petition no. 5770/2008 (M/s. Bajaj Stone Crusher v. Bank of India and others) and writ petition no. 5781/2008 (m/s. Saroj stone crusher v. Bank of india and others).
Get Solution & Price Right Now! leave your message here, we'll send you an Email immediately. * *
Get free access to the complete judgment in THE STATE OF HARYANA v. M/S KC STONE CRUSHING CO. on CaseMine.
12. On 11.12.2018, after the Supreme Court remand, the NGT passed a fresh order disposing of the O.A. No. 332/2017 whereby the onus was shifted to the State …
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:167336-DB Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 25003 of 2023 Petitioner :- Maa Vindhya Stone Crusher Company Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Udit Chandra,Nitesh Patel Counsel for Respondent :- CSC
Latest Judgments State of Uttaranchal & Ors. v. M/s. Kumaon Stone Crusher. February 19, 2015. Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19445/2004. Shri S.R. …
Supreme Court - Daily Orders State Of Uttaranchal vs M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher on 27 July, 2017 ... No(s). 19445/2004 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01-07-2004 in WP No. 1124/2001 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) STATE OF UTTARANCHAL & ORS. ...
Get free access to the complete judgment in Himalaya Stone Crusher Pvt. Ltd. v. State Of Uttarakhand on CaseMine.
Get free access to the complete judgment in Commissioner Of Sales Tax, U.P v. Lal Kunwa Stone Crusher (P) Ltd. . on CaseMine. ... Lal Kunwa Stone Crusher (P) Ltd. . Supreme Court Of India Mar 14, 2000; Subsequent References; CaseIQ (AI Recommendations) Commissioner Of Sales Tax, U.P v. Lal Kunwa Stone Crusher …
The observation of the Supreme Court cannot be termed to be 'obiter dicta' since the Supreme Court has held that the process of concrete by stone crushers is a manufacturing process. Therefore, there is no merit in the contention of the Revenue. Accordingly, all the questions are answered in favour of the assessee and against the …
In this petition, the petitioner, inter alia, seeks writ of mandamus commanding the respondents not to collect the tax from the petitioner for private land/road where the stone crusher has been installed and to collect the toll tax as per Section 4 of Levy of Toll Tax Act read with Section 2(i) of Levy of Toll Rules from the post where the …
Anu Sivaraman, J.:— This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief:— "(i) Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ order or direction directing the 2 respondent to process the application for environmental clearance submitted by the petitioner, on the basis of Ext.P3 District Survey Report, without insisting for a District …
Supreme Court of India M.C. Mehta vs Union Of India & Ors on 18 March, 2004 Author: ... Stone crushing sites in Pali : EPCA has inspected the stone crushing sites in the area. ... This is despite conditions in the judgment dated 10th May, 1996 by this Court that the Director Mining and Ecology Haryana would be responsible for mining in …
judgment. This direction is against 343 identified stone crusher units, as mentioned in the report of the Joint Committee dated 17th January, 2023. Further direction issued by the …
Get free access to the complete judgment in Maa Vindhya Stone Crusher Company v. State of U.P. and Another on CaseMine. ... This is also the view of the Supreme Court in the judgement reported in 1970 (1) SCC 121: The Board of High School and intermediate Education, U.P. and others vs. Kumari Chitra Srivastava and others. …
Get free access to the complete judgment in State Of Uttarakhand And Others v. New Taral Stone Crusher . on CaseMine.
crushing of the stone. High Court of Uttarakhand has taken a contrary view in its judgment dated 01.07.2004 in Kumaon Stone Crusher (Supra), as noted above. 62. Learned counsel for the writ petitioners have relied on few judgments of this Court which need to be noticed. Reliance is placed on Two Judge Bench in